Cost-Cutting Helped Macy's Limit Pain from Shutdowns

The no-moat company's operating loss was not as bad as we feared. We view shares as undervalued.

Securities In This Article
Macy's Inc
(M)

No-moat Macy’s M sales were greatly affected by coronavirus-related temporary store closures in the second quarter of 2020 as 53% e-commerce growth was not enough to overcome a 61% drop in store sales. The firm suffered a same-store sales decline of 34.7% on an owned basis, which exactly matched our forecast. Yet, its operating loss was not as bad as we feared as its selling, general, and administrative expenses came in about 15% below our expectation on staff furloughs and other cost cuts. Macy’s did not provide formal guidance, but its current trends are roughly in line with our prior view. Thus, we do not expect to make any material change for our per share fair value estimate of $16.30 and view it as undervalued. While Macy’s has big challenges, we believe it has enough liquidity to get through the current crisis and its large e-commerce exposure (54% of second quarter sales) is an advantage over some rivals.

Macy’s 23.6% quarterly gross margin on net sales was well below last year (38.8%) but was 180 basis points better than our forecast. The firm reported improved sell-through, which aided pricing and led to a 27% decline in inventories from the first quarter. Strength in luxury and home in the quarter partially offset weakness in apparel. Including restructuring charges of $242 million (mainly related to layoffs), Macy’s operating margin and EPS of negative 18% and negative $1.39, respectively, outperformed our forecast of negative 25% and negative $2.24.

Macy’s recovery in the second half of 2020 appears slow. The firm projected fall season same-store sales down in the low- to mid-20% range, slightly worse than our forecast of negative 20% for the third quarter. Usually a strength, Macy’s flagship stores are suffering due to low international tourism and the large number of corporate employees who are working from home. However, we now think its expense savings will be greater than originally expected after it cut 3,900 corporate jobs in late June.

Morningstar Premium Members gain exclusive access to our full analyst reports, including fair value estimates, bull and bear breakdowns, and risk analyses. Not a Premium Member? Get this and other reports immediately when you try Morningstar Premium free for 14 days.

More in Stocks

About the Author

David Swartz

Senior Equity Analyst
More from Author

David Swartz is a senior equity analyst, AM Consumer, for Morningstar*. He covers department stores, specialty retailers, and manufacturers and retailers of apparel, footwear, and accessories, such as Nike, Lululemon, Tapestry, and Ulta Beauty.

Before joining Morningstar in 2018, Swartz worked as a money manager and equity analyst for a family office in the Seattle area. Prior to that position, he worked for a financial software firm and as an analyst and fund manager for three equity hedge funds in the San Francisco Bay Area.

Swartz holds a bachelor’s degree in economics from the University of California at Berkeley and a master’s degree in economics from Yale University. He also holds a certificate in finance (investment management specialization) from UC Berkeley Extension.

* Morningstar Research Services LLC (“Morningstar”) is a wholly owned subsidiary of Morningstar, Inc

Sponsor Center