CXMT IPO: A Well-Positioned China Memory Chip Stock

As Morningstar launches research coverage of CXMT, we think the company can capitalize on AI demand within China.

Illustration montrant en gros plan une puce semi-conductrice connectée à d'autres composants semi-conducteurs, illustrant son intégration dans la technologie de l'IA.
Securities in This Article
CXMT Corp Class A
(688825)

CXMT 688825, China’s marquee IPO, debuted in what can only be considered a roaring year for memory chip stocks. The offering price was set at CNY 8.66 per share, but the stock jumped nearly 470% on its first day of trading, leaving it well above our fair value estimate.

As we launch Morningstar research coverage of the IPO, we break down our views on CXMT’s business, its prospects, and the broader industry.

Company Overview

CXMT is the fourth-largest manufacturer of dynamic random access memory chips globally, with a 9% bit market share as of 2025. DRAM chips are memory semiconductor chips that store data temporarily during data processing. DRAM is considered a volatile memory product; it can only operate when a device’s power system is online.

Founded in 2016 from the acquisition of intellectual property of the now-defunct memory maker Qimonda, CXMT’s products mainly consist of conventional memory chips. The firm is headquartered in Anhui, China, with 97% of its sales as of 2025 coming from the Greater China region.

Business Outlook and Prospects

f
Source: IDC and Morningstar estimates.

CXMT’s DRAM bit shipment market share rose from 1% in 2021 to 9% in 2025, driven by rapid expansion and improvement in its manufacturing capabilities while supported by an ongoing government push for the adoption of domestic semiconductor technologies. The deepening undersupply in memory chips as a result of the tremendous surge in artificial intelligence investments has also led to growing adoption of its products by global consumer electronics leaders, as procurement needs become increasingly unfulfilled with memory makers prioritizing AI memory supply over consumer products.

We expect these factors to continue acting as catalysts for CXMT’s growth moving forward. AI investment intensity is starting to pick up, and we foresee strong private and public sector investment into AI infrastructure as AI progress increasingly becomes both a matter of business competitiveness and national security. Global adoption in consumer electronics is also expected to continue, as electronics players who are currently facing margin headwinds as a result of deep memory undersupply will likely aim to diversify their memory supply chain in order to weaken the pricing power of existing memory leaders. We foresee CXMT’s market share reaching 10% in 2026.

That said, while we expect domestic AI investments to be a major demand driver for CXMT’s DRAM products, we do not expect the company to capture a material share of the global AI memory market due to technological gaps versus global leaders, which stem from restricted access to chipmaking equipment and geopolitical tensions that limit international adoption.

CXMT’s Technological Progress

CXMT’s DRAM manufacturing expertise has shown tremendous improvement, driven by aggressive R&D and capacity investments. R&D has averaged 17% and capital expenditure 188% of revenue over the past two years, well above the industry average. These outsized investments seem to have borne fruit, as the company’s rapid supply growth has allowed it to accommodate accelerating demand for domestic DRAM chips both in China and internationally.

CXMT’s high R&D intensity has also enabled it to close the technological gap with its peers from six to nine years to just three to four years—a tremendous pace of improvement, in our view. CXMT’s IPO proceeds will also be mainly spent on growth investment, with roughly 69% used for equipment upgrades and the rest for R&D, which we view as necessary to remain competitive in its offerings moving forward.

That said, we see growing challenges for CXMT to further close the gap with global memory leaders. We believe physical limitations are approaching CXMT in terms of node advancement. Memory leaders are expected to use EUV lithography and even high NA EUV lithography from the latest 1c DRAM node. CXMT’s latest G5 technology is equivalent to memory leaders’ 1a DRAM node 2 generations back, and without access to EUV lithography, we believe that conventional DRAM advancement will become increasingly difficult for CXMT beyond the next generation.

We foresee CXMT circumventing this by pushing the limits of extreme multi-patterning, as well as innovating on back-end packaging. We believe these innovations could prevent the gap in process knowledge from expanding, but that they’re insufficient for further narrowing the technological rift against global players.

High bandwidth memory remains a small part of CXMT’s shipments. We believe this is driven by low economic yields, due to HBM’s significantly higher production complexity versus conventional DRAM. That said, we still expect CXMT to invest heavily in HBM expertise as customer interest accelerates alongside China’s AI investments, and we believe HBM will become an increasingly important part of CXMT’s business moving forward.

We think CXMT is well-positioned to capitalize on rising domestic AI demand. CXMT is expected to commercialize HBM3 by 2026, and a rapid emergence of domestic AI chips that use HBM provides strong prospective demand for CXMT to fulfil.

The National Angle, and Geopolitical Tensions and Implications

AI is increasingly a national security issue for China, and we believe CXMT is a key beneficiary. We view China’s continued support of domestic chip technology and capacity, from raw silicon to completed, packaged chips and broader data center infrastructure, as a long-term goal toward becoming self-sufficient in semiconductor manufacturing.

To this end, China is encouraging homegrown chip adoption by domestic internet giants who are spearheading AI model advancement. While CXMT’s technologies still lag global memory leaders, we expect robust adoption of its chips, as the government encourages AI architectures to be built with domestic technology in consideration.

That said, we do not foresee global memory players being shut out from fulfilling China’s memory needs. CXMT’s wafer capacity remains small compared to its peers, which we estimate at 325,000 wafer starts per month by the end of 2026, roughly 1/6th of the projected 2026 capacity of the 3 memory leaders combined.

Furthermore, while AI chip access increasingly becomes a matter of national self-sufficiency, so is AI model progression. We see a delicate balance to be maintained between getting access to leading chips and ensuring that domestic chipmakers are not excluded from AI investment buildouts. We expect a scenario in which domestic internet companies are required to purchase a certain allocation of CXMT’s DRAM chips but are not denied access to leading global memory chips under existing trade conditions, allowing the advancement of both domestic AI software and hardware.

Economic Moats for CXMT and the Memory Industry

We maintain that the memory industry does not possess an economic moat, and that’s even more true for CXMT, whose technological expertise remains meaningfully behind peers.

DRAM pricing primarily reflects demand and supply conditions. Overall, DRAM chips are relatively commoditized products with little differentiation and are interchangeable between brands, possessing low switching costs. Furthermore, competitive dynamics change from one technology generation to the next, and as a result, no incumbent enjoys a technological edge that can be maintained over a decade. As such, we do not think any player can preserve excess returns structurally.

CXMT’s technological progress has been nothing short of impressive, but its inability to access EUV lithography technology is becoming a significant technological barrier to the progression of commercial and economically sound technologies, as the hardware limitations will make continued node advancement increasingly costly and complex. In turn, this is likely to prevent the company from materially closing the technological gap versus global memory leaders.

We do not think that overall product innovation will stagnate for CXMT and believe the company will find different ways to prevent the technological gap from re-expanding, such as introducing innovations in back-end packaging to support higher data transfer rates and bandwidth even with lower bit density. That said, we expect these workarounds will further weigh on final yields and keep profitability well under its peers, further underpinning our no-moat view of the company itself.

Our Fair Value Estimate and What Really Matters to Investors

Our fair value estimate for CXMT is CNY 14.90 per share, and while the IPO pricing was attractive at CNY 8.66, the almost 470% rise on the first day of trading means the shares are now significantly overvalued.

Our estimate implies a fiscal 2027 price/book ratio of 1.8 times, lower than our pure-play memory coverage, which we value at 2.1–2.3 times, but significantly higher than its IPO pricing implied at 2027 book value. We expect a valuation uplift from the ongoing memory upcycle.

Conventional DRAM Price (USD/GB)

g
Source: Company disclosures, Morningstar estimates, IDC

Multiples remain strictly under pure-play memory leaders in our coverage, given CXMT’s lagging technological capabilities, translating into lower DRAM prices versus its peers. We do not expect this pricing gap—and the corresponding valuation discount—to narrow unless CXMT can overcome the EUV constraint while maintaining economic profitability.

We forecast CXMT’s revenues to grow 405% in 2026 and 64% in 2027, with operating margins of 75% and 78% across this period, significantly higher than the 14% in 2025. Robust AI demand has led to deep DRAM undersupply, and limited capacity growth through 2027 implies strong near-term pricing dynamics.

That said, we view the currently strong DRAM prices as temporary. Beyond CXMT’s expansion, we expect sharp capacity growth from memory leaders in the latter half of 2027 and into 2028, which should ease the tight demand-supply dynamics and drive price erosion from 2029 onwards.

The author or authors do not own shares in any securities mentioned in this article. Find out about Morningstar’s editorial policies.

Sponsor Center