JPMorgan Active China ETF earns an Above Average Process Pillar rating.
The largest contributor to the rating is its parent firm's superior long-term risk-adjusted performance, as shown by the firm's average 10-year Morningstar Rating of 3.3 stars. The parent firm's five-year risk-adjusted success ratio of 53% also supports the rating. The measure indicates the percentage of a firm's funds that survived and outperformed their respective category's median Morningstar Risk-Adjusted Return for the period. Their impressive success ratio suggests that the firm does well for investors and that this fund may benefit from that. However, the process is limited by the experience of the management team, which averages four years at this fund.
This strategy hews closely to the market cap and investment style of its China Region category peers. Examining additional factor exposure, this strategy has held more highly liquid stocks compared to Morningstar Category Peers in the past few years. This gives the managers more flexibility during bear markets to sell without adversely affecting prices. In recent months, the strategy was more exposed to the Liquidity factor compared with its Morningstar Category peers as well. This strategy has also taken a contrarian approach with lower exposure to momentum stocks over peers in recent years. Momentum tends to be a powerful force in asset markets, as stocks that have done well recently usually continue to do so in the short term. As top performers change, this can sometimes be hard to capture without higher trading costs. Similarly, in recent months, the strategy also had less exposure to the Momentum factor than peers. In addition, this strategy has an underweight bias to the volatility factor, meaning investing in stocks that have a lower standard deviation of returns. These low-risk stocks are typically at their best when markets are not. Low volatility exposure contributes to limited loss on the downside at the cost of a lag in bull markets. In recent months, the strategy also had less Volatility factor exposure than its peers. More information on a fund and its respective category's factor exposure can be found in the Factor Profile module within the Portfolio section.
The portfolio is overweight in utilities and energy relative to the category average by 4.0 and 2.7 percentage points, respectively. The sectors with low exposure compared to category peers are technology and healthcare, with technology underweighting the average portfolio by 3.5 percentage points of assets and healthcare similar to the average. The portfolio is positioned across 51 holdings and is quite concentrated. Specifically, 47.0% of the strategy's assets are housed within the top 10 holdings, as opposed to the typical peer's 36.7%. And in closing, in terms of portfolio turnover, this portfolio turns over its holdings less quickly than peers, potentially leading to lower costs for investors and eliminating a drag on performance.