JPMorgan Divers Ret US Small Cap Eq ETF JPSE

The portfolio maintains a sizable cost advantage over competitors, priced within the least expensive fee quintile among peers.

The strategy's investment process inspires confidence and earns a High Process Pillar rating. Independent of the rating, analysis of the strategy's portfolio shows it has maintained an overweight in volatility exposure and an underweight in momentum exposure compared with category peers. High volatility exposure is attributed to companies with a higher standard deviation of returns. And low momentum exposure is rooted in holding stocks that are not currently on a winning streak and instead holding those that managers believe are undervalued. The strategy’s management team earns an Average People Pillar rating. The strategy's parent organization earns the firm an Above Average Parent Pillar rating. People Pillar and Parent Pillar ratings for this strategy are indirectly assigned by a Morningstar analyst rather than algorithmically derived. Please see the notes following each pillar section for more details. The details of assigning methods can be found in each pillar section.

JPMorgan Divers Ret US Small Cap Eq ETF earns a High Process Pillar rating.

The leading factor in the rating is that this fund tracks an index. Historical data, like Morningstar's Active/Passive Barometer, finds that passively managed funds have generally outperformed their active counterparts, especially over longer time horizons. Impressive risk-adjusted performance also supports the process. This can be seen in the fund's five-year alpha calculated relative to the category index, which suggests that the managers have shown skill in their allocation of risk. The parent firm's excellent risk-adjusted performance, as shown by its average 10-year Morningstar Rating of 3.3 stars, influences the rating as well.

This strategy skews toward smaller, more value-oriented companies compared with its average peer in the Small Blend Morningstar Category. Examining additional factor exposure, this strategy has consistently overweighted the volatility factor compared with Morningstar Category peers over the last few years, meaning it invests in stocks with a history of the higher standard deviation of returns. This is a higher-risk, higher-reward approach. In recent months, the strategy was more exposed to the Volatility factor compared with its Morningstar Category peers as well. This strategy has also taken a contrarian approach with lower exposure to momentum stocks over peers in recent years. Momentum investors tend to expect stocks that have done well recently to continue to do so in the short term. Momentum approaches can entail higher turnover and trading costs since the top stocks can often change. Similarly, in recent months, the strategy also had less exposure to the Momentum factor than peers. Additionally, the managers have tended to overweight yield, shown by the portfolio's high exposure to stocks paying dividends or buying back shares. High-yield stocks tend to be associated with more mature, profitable businesses that can grow as well as provide a stream of income. Such stocks could suffer, however, if setbacks force them to cut their dividends. In this month, the strategy also had more exposure to the Yield factor over its peers. More information on a fund and its respective category's factor exposure can be found in the Factor Profile module within the Portfolio section.

The portfolio is overweight in real estate and basic materials relative to the category average by 8.6 and 3.7 percentage points, respectively. The sectors with low exposure compared to category peers are industrials and financial services, underweight the average by 6.6 and 4.4 percentage points of assets, respectively. The portfolio is positioned across 559 holdings and is less top-heavy than peers. Specifically, 4.3% of the fund’s assets are concentrated within the top 10 fund holdings, compared to the category’s 24.9% average. And in closing, in terms of portfolio turnover, this portfolio turns over its holdings less quickly than peers, potentially leading to lower costs for investors and eliminating a drag on performance.

There are four managers listed on the fund: Yazann Romahi, Natalia Zvereva, Joe Staines, Yegang(Steven) Wu. Together, they manage a total of six strategies, with a Gold asset-weighted average Morningstar Medalist Rating, indicating the potential to deliver positive alpha relative to the category median in aggregate.

Note: This People Pillar rating is indirectly assigned by an analyst. Morningstar analysts evaluate the People Pillar for passive products at the brand level and may also differentiate by asset class. There is at least one other passive strategy at the firm that is covered by a Morningstar analyst, so the People Pillar rating of the fund is inherited from the rating that the Morningstar analyst assigned to investment vehicles under the same brand name.

J.P. Morgan is a well-resourced, diligent, and responsible steward of client assets. Investment teams are seasoned and stalwart, especially in equity and fixed income, the latter of which has successfully undergone substantial transformation in recent years. The firm offers competitive compensation that is aligned with fundholders and shows strong retention at senior levels of the organization. It demonstrates a culture of constant innovation and willingness to evolve. For example, J.P. Morgan recently expanded its investment committee process through which senior leaders review various teams and strategies, and it continues to develop proprietary portfolio management and risk oversight tools. Some funds still face high fee hurdles, but the firm has generally lowered expenses as it has grown.

The firm isn't without its complications. J.P. Morgan's product offering is extensive, and some areas need improvement. For instance, its multi-asset business has faced some challenges as a result of complex investment processes. The firm continues to build out its footprint in China, but its efforts there remain unproven. Although not every strategy is the best in its class, J.P. Morgan remains earnest in the pursuit of excellence, and investors are well-served.

Over a seven-year period, this share class outperformed the category’s average return by 1.7 percentage points annualized. And it also outperformed the category index, the Russell 2000 Index, by an annualized 1.7 percentage points over the same period.

The risk-adjusted performance only continues to make a case for this fund. The share class had a higher Sharpe ratio, a measure of risk-adjusted return, than the index over the trailing five-year period. Notably, these strong risk-adjusted results have not come with more volatility for investors. This strategy took on similar risk as the benchmark, as measured by standard deviation. However, the share class proved itself ineffective as it was unable to generate alpha, over the same five-year period, against the category group index: a benchmark that encapsulates the performance of the broader asset class.

This share class is within the cheapest quintile of its Morningstar Category. Its attractive fee, considered jointly with the fund’s People, Process, and Parent Pillars, suggests that this share class has high potential to deliver positive alpha versus its category benchmark, leading to its Morningstar Medalist Rating of Gold.