JPMorgan Climate Change Solutions ETF TEMP

The portfolio maintains a sizable cost advantage over competitors, priced within the least expensive fee quintile among peers.

The strategy's effective investment philosophy supports an Above Average Process Pillar rating. Independent of the rating, analysis of the strategy's portfolio shows it has maintained a significant overweight position in liquidity exposure and an underweight in quality exposure compared with category peers. High liquidity exposure is attributed to stocks with a high trading volume, lending managers more flexibility. And a low quality exposure is rooted in stocks with higher financial leverage and lower profitability. The strategy’s management team earns an Above Average People Pillar rating. The strategy's parent organization earns the firm an Above Average Parent Pillar rating. People Pillar and Parent Pillar ratings for this strategy are indirectly assigned by a Morningstar analyst rather than algorithmically derived. Please see the notes following each pillar section for more details. The details of assigning methods can be found in each pillar section.

JPMorgan Climate Change Solutions ETF earns an Above Average Process Pillar rating.

The leading factor in the rating is its parent firm's excellent long-term risk-adjusted performance, as shown by the firm's average 10-year Morningstar Rating of 3.3 stars. The parent firm's five-year risk-adjusted success ratio of 54% also influences the rating. The measure indicates the percentage of a firm's funds that survived and beat their respective category's median Morningstar Risk-Adjusted Return for the period. Their commendable success ratio suggests that the firm does well for investors and that this fund may benefit from that. Lastly, the process is limited by being an actively managed strategy. Historical data, such as Morningstar's Active/Passive Barometer, finds that actively managed funds have generally underperformed their passive counterparts, especially over longer time horizons.

This strategy leans toward smaller, deeper value companies compared with its average peer in the Global Large-Stock Growth Morningstar Category. Examining additional factor exposure, this strategy has held more highly liquid stocks compared to Morningstar Category Peers in the past few years. More-liquid assets contribute to more-flexible exit strategies without price changes and tend to be a ballast during market selloffs. For example, if the portfolio faces successive redemptions in a short period of time, it will be less likely to experience a significant loss. In recent months, the strategy was more exposed to the Liquidity factor compared with its Morningstar Category peers as well. This strategy has also tilted toward low-quality stocks, companies with higher financial leverage and lower profitability over peers in recent years. Lacking this ballast, the fund's prospects could rest on its ability to surpass peers during economic booms. Similarly, in recent months, the strategy also had less exposure to the Quality factor than peers. Additionally, the managers have consistently taken on more risk, demonstrated by higher volatility exposure than peers. Such stocks tend to rise faster and fall harder than the broad market. High-volatility exposure contributes to stronger performance during bull markets, but often at the cost of losing more during downturns. Nevertheless, the fund's Volatility exposure was in line with peers in the latest month. More information on a fund and its respective category's factor exposure can be found in the Factor Profile module within the Portfolio section.

The portfolio is overweight in industrials and utilities relative to the category average by 54.6 and 11.1 percentage points, respectively. The sectors with low exposure compared to category peers are technology and healthcare, underweight the average by 18.3 and 13.9 percentage points of assets, respectively. The strategy owns 69 securities and is relatively top-heavy. Of the strategy's assets, 36.8% are concentrated within the top 10 holdings, as opposed to the typical peer's 34.7%. And finally, in terms of portfolio turnover, this fund trades more frequently than its average peer, potentially racking up additional expenses for investors and creating a drag on performance.

This share class’ quantitatively driven People Pillar content was not generated because of insufficient data. To generate individualized content, the Medalist Rating quantitative analysis requires sufficient data to generate its framework of “ mental models ” designed to mimic content written by analysts.

An algorithmically assigned People Pillar uses an algorithm designed to predict the People Pillar rating analysts would assign the investment product, if they covered it.

J.P. Morgan is a well-resourced, diligent, and responsible steward of client assets. Investment teams are seasoned and stalwart, especially in equity and fixed income, the latter of which has successfully undergone substantial transformation in recent years. The firm offers competitive compensation that is aligned with fundholders and shows strong retention at senior levels of the organization. It demonstrates a culture of constant innovation and willingness to evolve. For example, J.P. Morgan recently expanded its investment committee process through which senior leaders review various teams and strategies, and it continues to develop proprietary portfolio management and risk oversight tools. Some funds still face high fee hurdles, but the firm has generally lowered expenses as it has grown.

The firm isn't without its complications. J.P. Morgan's product offering is extensive, and some areas need improvement. For instance, its multi-asset business has faced some challenges as a result of complex investment processes. The firm continues to build out its footprint in China, but its efforts there remain unproven. Although not every strategy is the best in its class, J.P. Morgan remains earnest in the pursuit of excellence, and investors are well-served.

However, with such a short track record, fortunes could easily reverse. In the last two years, this share class has returned 11.1%, compared with the 17.5% return of the category benchmark, the MSCI ACWI Growth Index, for the same period. It also trailed peers as the category’s average return for the period was 12.9%. The share class had a lower Sharpe ratio, a measure of risk-adjusted returns, than the index over the trailing one-year period.

This share class is in the cheapest quintile of its Morningstar Category. Its low fee, paired with the fund’s People, Process, and Parent Pillars, indicates that this share class can deliver positive alpha compared with its category benchmark, leading to its Morningstar Medalist Rating of Silver.