JPMorgan Carbon Transition US Eq ETF earns a High Process Pillar rating.
The most important driver of the rating is its parent firm's superior long-term risk-adjusted performance, as shown by the firm's average 10-year Morningstar Rating of 3.3 stars. This fund tracks an index, which also increases its process rating. Historical data, like Morningstar's Active/Passive Barometer, shows that passively managed funds have generally outperformed their active counterparts, especially over longer time horizons. The parent firm's five-year risk-adjusted success ratio of 55% contributes to the process. The measure indicates the percentage of a firm's funds that survived and surpassed their respective category's median Morningstar Risk-Adjusted Return for the period. Their noteworthy success ratio suggests that this firm does well for investors and that this fund may benefit from that.
The investment strategy as stated in the fund's prospectus is:
The investment seeks investment results that closely correspond, before fees and expenses, and to the performance of the JPMorgan Asset Management Carbon Transition U.S. Equity Index. The fund will invest at least 80% of its assets in securities included in index. The index is designed to capture the performance of companies which have been identified through its rules-based process as better positioned to benefit from a transition to a lower carbon economy while also providing broader U.S. market exposure.
The portfolio is overweight in technology by 4.0 percentage points in terms of assets compared with the category average, and its real estate allocation is similar to the category. The sectors with low exposure compared to category peers are industrials and consumer defensive, with industrials underweighting the average portfolio by 2.6 percentage points of assets and consumer defensive similar to the average. The portfolio is composed of 400 holdings and is less top-heavy than peers. Specifically, 33.0% of the portfolio's assets are concentrated within the top 10 fund holdings, as opposed to the category’s 50.1% average. And finally, in terms of portfolio turnover, this fund trades less regularly than the typical peer in its category, which may result in a lower cost to investors.