JPMorgan Diversified Return EMkts Eq ETF earns a High Process Pillar rating.
The most notable contributor to the rating is that this fund tracks an index. Historical data, like Morningstar's Active/Passive Barometer, finds that passively managed funds have generally outperformed their active counterparts, especially over longer time horizons. The parent firm's superior risk-adjusted performance, as shown by its average 10-year Morningstar Rating of 3.3 stars, also influences the rating. Excellent risk-adjusted performance also supports the rating, as shown by the fund's five-year alpha calculated relative to the category index, which suggests that the managers have shown skill in their allocation of risk.
This strategy leans toward smaller, more value-oriented companies compared with its average peer in the Diversified Emerging Mkts Morningstar Category. Examining additional factor exposure, this strategy has continually displayed high-yield exposure compared with Morningstar Category peers during recent years, holding more companies returning cash to shareholders via dividends or buybacks. High-yield stocks tend to be connected to more mature companies earning enough cash to return some to shareholders. At times, however, extreme market pressure can force them to cut their dividends, which hurts stock performance. In recent months, the strategy was more exposed to the Yield factor compared with its Morningstar Category peers as well. This strategy has also exhibited a tilt toward low-volatility stocks in recent years, meaning companies with a lower historical standard deviation of returns. These low-risk stocks are typically at their best when markets are not. Low volatility exposure contributes to limited loss on the downside at the cost of a lag in bull markets. Similarly, in recent months, the strategy also had less exposure to the Volatility factor than peers. In addition, this strategy has not maintained a defensive tilt, demonstrated by low exposure to the quality factor. This means the fund avoids holding firms that are consistently profitable, growing, and have solid balance sheets. Lacking this ballast, the fund's prospects could rest on its ability to beat peers during economic booms. In recent months, the strategy also had less Quality factor exposure than its peers. More information on a fund and its respective category's factor exposure can be found in the Factor Profile module within the Portfolio section.
The portfolio is overweight in utilities and industrials relative to the category average by 6.9 and 5.8 percentage points, respectively. The sectors with low exposure compared to category peers are technology and consumer cyclical, underweight the average by 18.7 and 4.5 percentage points of assets, respectively. The strategy owns 545 securities and is diversified among those holdings. In its most recent portfolio, 9.9% of the fund’s assets were concentrated in the top 10 fund holdings, compared to the category’s 26.0% average. And finally, in terms of portfolio turnover, this fund trades less frequently than the category’s average, potentially limiting costs to investors.